top of page


I’m tired of being gaslit by the tech industry about the future of work.
Twenty-seven years after the first wave of digital recruitment, the technology has changed dramatically—but the underlying hiring system has not. Drawing on my own experience designing recruitment UX in 1999, I explore why simply adding more AI to legacy processes risks automating old biases, and why Adonea.ai is being built around demonstrated capability, human intent, and a new model of human–AI interaction.
Idonea
5 days ago5 min read


When the Interface Becomes the Barrier
What if the barrier isn’t a person’s capability, but the interface they are forced to use? We explore how intent-based UX/UI, neurodiversity, and AI could help remove unnecessary barriers without lowering standards or taking human judgment away.
Idonea
Aug 296 min read


When AI Changes Your Job, You Shouldn’t Have to Start Again
When AI changes a job, people shouldn’t have to start over. Skills, experience, and demonstrated capabilities can carry forward as work evolves, helping people move into new opportunities without being reduced to a job title.
Idonea
Aug 102 min read


Different Responsibilities, Not One Powerful AI
See how Idonea uses human-centered AI recruitment to protect candidate control, privacy, and accountable decision-making.
Idonea
Aug 82 min read


Why Adonea.ai Limits the Power of Its Own AI
The AI race often treats more capability, autonomy, data, and speed as progress. Idonea asks a different question: how much authority should any AI system have over a person’s access to work? We believe AI should support understanding—not rank people, control opportunity, or make decisions no human is prepared to own.
Idonea
Aug 72 min read
bottom of page